Sunday, November 24, 2024
28.0°F

Lakefront property owners will likely see tax relief in 2015

by David Reese Bigfork Eagle
| December 17, 2014 11:00 PM

Owners of lakefront property in Montana will likely see property tax reductions in 2015.

Property taxes on lakefront or recreational property in Montana exploded in 2008, just as a recession crippled the American economy while those same properties saw dramatic decreases in market value.

But starting last January 2014, the Montana Department of Revenue began the reappraisal process that occurs every six years, and the outlook is good for property-tax reduction in 2015, according to Scott Williams, regional manager for the Montana Department of Revenue.

“Recreational property was still part of the big bubble in 2008,” Williams said.

The department evaluates over 70,000 properties in northwest Montana. Some of those properties receive a personal visit from the Department of Revenue, while others are included in a mass appraisal, Williams said.

The last appraisal, in 2008, resulted in tax protests, but in the last few years of this appraisal cycle the protests have died down, Williams said.

While lakefront and recreational properties saw a large increase in valuation in 2008, the average homeowner in northwest Montana did not see an increase in property taxes.

In this year’s appraisal process, lakefront properties will see the largest average decreases in Lake County and Flathead County, Williams said. 

Yellowstone County, which is in the midst of an oil boom, will not see overall property tax decreases, Williams said.

The six-year appraisal cycle concerns some lawmakers. The Legislature, which convenes next month in Helena, will likely introduce bills trying to set the appraisal process to occur more frequently.

The state doesn’t face a reduction in property tax revenue even if a particular county’s tax revenue falls in one class. Montana counties have the ability to increase the value of the mills they collect to offset any decrease, Williams said. 

“The whole goal of a reappraisal cycle is to make sure no specific class of property pays a disproportionate share,” he said.

Some properties, whether residential, commercial or recreational, saw a 30- to 70 percent increase in valuation last appraisal, but didn’t see large increases in taxes.

And for those property owners who don’t like what their tax bill looks like, they can always protest. A protest can be filed with the state tax appeal board, but the property owner must still pay the disputed amount. If the tax bill is ultimately reduced, the property owner receives a refund of the disputed amount. Disputing a tax amount simply does not get the tax removed, Williams said.

Some of the larger commercial property owners in Flathead County protest their taxes every year. Charter Communications has protested its tax bill every year in the last five years, Williams said. Plum Creek and Columbia Falls Aluminum Company are also frequent protesters of taxes and property valuations, he said.

Flathead Lake property owner Don Abbey has protested the taxes on his Shelter Island home the last two years, Williams said.

Abbey is seeking to have the valuation on his lakefront property reduced by about $31 million. His tax bill is $367,000.36

With the average Montanan property owner paying 1 percent to 1.85 percent taxes, Abbey’s taxes are at .08 percent, well below the state average.

The state tax appeal board in Helena recently heard arguments from Abbey and his attorneys whether the state properly assessed Abbey’s home and other structures on Shelter Island. Abbey built the home and boathouse in 2011 and has it listed for sale for $59.5 million, which also includes most of a wooded island near Rollins.

The state says the 24,000-square-foot, three-story home and other improvements on the island, such as a 5,000-square-foot boathouse and apartments, are worth $41.8 million, and the state is basing property taxes based on that value.

A Missoula appraiser hired by Abbey said the home and other structures should be assessed at $9.8 million.