City, county differ on library break-up
The transition to a city library in
Whitefish may not be going the way city officials and leaders in
the library secession movement had hoped after the Whitefish City
Council approved splitting from the county on Oct. 18 last
year.
A plan on how to divide books and other
assets at the Whitefish branch library between the city and the
county that was developed by county library staff was unanimously
approved by the Flathead County Library board at their March 24
meeting.
The plan also calls for closing the
Whitefish library on June 18 so all county-owned materials can be
removed before handing over the library to the city on July 1.
Staff will gradually remove materials through April, May and June,
according to county library director Kim Crowley.
Whitefish city manager Chuck Stearns
said he and others in Whitefish are disappointed about the two-week
closure. Members of the Whitefish Library Association and the
Whitefish Community Library board of trustees had hoped the library
could remain open while the city transitioned in and the county
transitioned out from June 1 through the end of August.
“They’ve said they need months to move
things out and a two-week closure,” Stearns said. “We think some of
that isn’t in their purview, and we say the interlocal agreement
doesn’t allow for that.”
County library board member Connie
Leistiko has a different view.
“Their objective is to start a new
library,” she said. “Ours is to do as much as we can before we
vacate.”
There’s simply no way for the county to
operate through June 30 and vacate the building by July 1, Leistiko
said. She acknowledged there will be some inconvenience to
Whitefish residents for the final 12 days of June.
“But we didn’t terminate the
agreement,” Leistiko stressed. “Whitefish did.”
Board member Laura Long agreed.
“We can’t operate until midnight and
then poof, we’re gone,” she said. “No reasonable person would say
that.”
———
Dividing up the library materials could
be more crucial. The Whitefish library currently holds about 35,000
items, Crowley said, including books, magazines, newspapers, CDs,
DVDs, tapes and audio books.
City and county representatives have
been meeting to talk about the transition for several months,
Leistiko said, but every time the conversation turns to the
relocation plan, an impasse occurs.
“They don’t want us to take out one
book, and we’ve told them that’s not the case,” she said.
Fellow board member Michael Morton
pointed out that it’s the library board and library staff’s
responsibility to keep valuable books in the county library
collection.
“For someone to say we can’t move a
book is ridiculous,” he said.
The county library board is established
under state law and is independent of the Flathead County Board of
Commissioners. The commissioners have no say in how the library
board conducts its business, but they do have a say over whether a
levy supporting the library is put on the ballot.
Whitefish community leaders recognize
that county library officials have compromised in what books
they’ve agreed to leave in Whitefish, Stearns said. However, when
negotiations about the library’s assets began, the county’s
position was that nothing was to be left behind. Stearns also is
worried that books relocated to other county libraries “will be the
cream of the crop.”
“We think in order to best serve people
around Whitefish it makes sense to keep all or most of the books
there,” Stearns said.
Anne Moran, a member of the Whitefish
Community Library Board overseeing the establishment of a new local
library, supported the city’s efforts.
“Given the history of the Whitefish
library’s interlocal situation and the Flathead County Library
System’s funding structure, the Whitefish Community Library Board
believes the city’s requests on behalf of the Whitefish community
are fair and appropriate, and we strongly support the negotiating
team’s efforts,” she said. “Meanwhile, we’re focused on progressing
with preparations for the new Whitefish Community Library to open
its doors this coming July. We’ve had tremendous support and
enthusiasm from the community and are excited about our new
opportunities.”
———
According to the county library board’s
plan, library staff have begun assigning materials low, medium and
high classifications. Items not pegged for transfer to another
county library could be donated to the new Whitefish Community
Library, to another library such as a school library, to the
Friends of the Library for resale, or they could be discarded.
Library staff already have determined
that most audio books and DVDs will be placed in another county
library because of their popularity, but Crowley and Leistiko
estimate about half the items now in Whitefish will remain there
once the county completes its assessment and relocation effort.
Items that will remain in Whitefish,
according to the county plan, will include all books donated to the
Whitefish library by Whitefish residents as a memorial or a gift,
books and other items purchased for the library by the Whitefish
Community Center, books belonging to the Whitefish city library
prior to when it became part of the county library system in 1976,
and books that the county library has multiple copies of and
doesn’t need.
Whitefish library supporters had a
different proposal that included four options:
• Leave all Whitefish library assets in
place;
• Transfer library assets to the new
Whitefish Community Library in exchange for library services to
county residents who live outside the city limits but near
Whitefish and who won’t be paying city taxes to support the city
library;
• Allocate an additional 800 volumes to
the Whitefish library or sell them to the city at a nominal
cost;
• Agree that as a condition of leaving
all assets in Whitefish, if the Whitefish Community Library ceases
to exist, all those assets be transferred back to the county
library system.
“I’m not prepared to recommend any of
those,” Leistiko said of the local supporters’ proposal.
———
The division of library assets involves
more than books — it also involves money and tax revenue. It’s
worth noting that Whitefish city residents are also county
residents, and they were paying about $120,000 a year to the county
library system. All told, taxes paid by Whitefish residents
constitute 12 percent of the county’s tax base, Stearns said.
“One way would be to think we should
get 12 percent of the countywide library books,” he said.
Stearns notes that while Whitefish has
asked for books and other items in the library catalog, it hasn’t
asked for any equipment or furnishings that Whitefish tax dollars
helped pay for.
Along these lines, Whitefish library
supporters also have asked that a portion of the county library’s
depreciation fund be given to them. That idea didn’t receive a
favorable response from the county library board.
“We’ve said ‘no way,’” Leistiko
said.
Long agreed.
“I’m struggling with their inability or
refusal to acknowledge things like they deserve a piece of the
depreciation fund,” Long said. “There’s no basis for that position.
That’s county money. The entitlement issue has been interesting and
frustrating.”
On the same day the Whitefish City
Council voted to terminate its interlocal agreement with the
county, it received an opinion from the Montana Attorney General
saying city residents could be exempted from the 5.95 mill levy the
county currently collects for the valleywide library system if the
city established its own tax-supported library.
That levy money could now be
re-directed to a city library, but it was unclear if it was enough.
To make up any shortfall in operating costs, the Whitefish Library
Association has pledged $15,000 a year for five years, while
library supporters Jake and Connie Heckathorn have pledged
$100,000.